Related Articles
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s winery battle continues with a move that could delve deeper into claims that Pitt was abusive. In a decision made Monday, Nov. 25, a judge ruled that Pitt, 60, must disclose documents that Paul Murphy, a lawyer for Jolie, 49, says will prove “communications concerning abuse, lies to authorities, and years of cover up” on Pitt’s part.
These include emails, texts and other written communications, but nothing between him and his attorneys or therapists.
Pitt’s legal team previously sought for her motion to be denied, calling the actress’ requests “wide-ranging and intrusive,” as well as a “sensationalist fishing expedition.”
Murphy claims the documentation they’re seeking to bring to light is “crucial evidence” that Pitt has “fought for years to hide.” He adds in a statement Nov. 26, “His actions harmed Angelina and their children and are central to this case.”
“But I want to again emphasize that Angelina never wanted any of this,” continued Murphy. “She never pressed charges, she left all their properties, and she is the one who tried to sell him the business in the first place. To this day, Mr. Pitt has never been held accountable for his actions and has at all times controlled Miraval and the winery, yet he still demands more. She wants this to end, the children want this to end, and Mr. Pitt should focus on healing their family, not pursuing lawsuits.”
“If he does not,” the lawyer added, “Angelina will defend herself in court by presenting the evidence necessary to demonstrate that Pitt’s allegations are demonstrably false.”
Reps for Pitt did not respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment.
This legal dispute, brought by Pitt, is in regards to Jolie selling her half of their winery estate Château Miraval to Tenute del Mondo, the wine division of the Stoli Group, in 2022, allegedly breaking an agreement they had to not sell without the other’s approval.
Earlier this month, Pitt scored an important victory in the winery battle, inching the case closer to trial with potential proof that there was a written agreement between the former couple as well about selling. A Pitt source said of the judge siding with him that time, “This is a clear victory for Brad which demonstrates the legitimacy of his claims and demonstrates yet again the other side’s talk is not backed up with substance.”
Jolie previously argued that she tried selling it back to Pitt, but he required an NDA as part of the deal, which she rejected.
In the winery saga, a judge ruled in May that Jolie must produce eight years’ worth of non-disclosure agreements she has made. By having her disclose her history of using NDA’s, Pitt’s team hopes to illustrate that it’s a normal business practice. Jolie’s team, however, claimed Pitt’s NDA offer was wide-ranging and would have contractually bound her to “silence” about his alleged abuse.
In July, Murphy said in a statement that Jolie wants Pitt to “end the fighting” by dropping this lawsuit.
Pitt, in his past offer to buy Jolie’s stake in the winery, “tried to punish and control Angelina by demanding a newly expanded NDA to cover his personal misconduct and abuse,” Murphy said at the time, adding, “Those actions are central to these proceedings. We are not at all surprised Mr. Pitt is afraid to turn over the documents demonstrating these facts.”
